Bank Fraud Conviction Reversed Because Insufficient Proof American Express Is “Financial Institution”
United States v. Davis, No. 12-20443 (Aug. 19, 2013) (Elrod, Higginson, Martinez)
Begrudgingly, the panel held that the government "did not offer evidence sufficient for any reasonable jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that American Express Company was a depository institution holding company." The testimony at trial regarding American Express Company being a financial institution as described in the statute was scant and did not fully support a financial institution theory. The panel reversed the district court’s denial of Davis’s motion for a judgment of acquittal and remanded, noting that the decision compels dismissal of the bank-fraud counts on remand.
The lesson: every element is essential and must be proved in the context of the trial. (It does not matter if other courts have found that American Express Company is a financial institution.) "Reversal may be required even though the government might have discharged its burden of proof with relative ease."
Begrudgingly, the panel held that the government "did not offer evidence sufficient for any reasonable jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that American Express Company was a depository institution holding company." The testimony at trial regarding American Express Company being a financial institution as described in the statute was scant and did not fully support a financial institution theory. The panel reversed the district court’s denial of Davis’s motion for a judgment of acquittal and remanded, noting that the decision compels dismissal of the bank-fraud counts on remand.
The lesson: every element is essential and must be proved in the context of the trial. (It does not matter if other courts have found that American Express Company is a financial institution.) "Reversal may be required even though the government might have discharged its burden of proof with relative ease."
Labels: Bank Fraud
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home