Government Not Required to Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt No Entrapment, and § 2B3.1(b)(7) Enhancement Inapplicable in Robbery with No Actual Loss
Stephens appealed his convictions related to a
conspiracy to rob an armored truck. The panel affirmed the convictions and the
sentence.
Stephens appealed on four grounds: 1) The district
court erred in declining to give an entrapment jury instruction; 2) the
evidence presented was insufficient to support his convictions; 3) the district
court erred in calculating his advisory Sentencing Guidelines range at
sentencing; and 4) the sentenced imposed by the district court was substantively
unreasonable.
The panel held that Stephens did not meet the
requirements to be entitled to an entrapment instruction because he failed to
point to sufficient evidence that would have allowed a reasonable jury to find
that he lacked a predisposition to commit the offenses at issue. The panel also held that the evidence
presented by the Government was sufficient to support Stephens’ convictions,
noting that the Government is not required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
that a defendant was not entrapped.
The panel found that the court erred in calculating Stephens’s
advisory Sentencing Guidelines range, but the error did not affect his
substantial rights. The court erroneously applied U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(7)(D), a
provision that only applies when there is actual loss in a robbery. In this
case, there was no actual loss. The panel rejected Stephens’s sentencing
entrapment argument noting that they have never recognized sentencing
entrapment as a defense. They also found that the Government only provided a
passive encouragement to pursue more than $250,000, and that it was one of his
co-conspirators who originally suggested a higher target. The panel affirmed
that the Defendant’s sentence was not substantively unreasonable because the
sentence fell within Stephens’s Guidelines range.
Thanks to FPD Intern Matthew Gonzalez for this blog
post.
Labels: Entrapment, Guidelines
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home