Peer-to-Peer File Sharing is CP Distribution; Use-of-Computer Enhancement Not Double-Counting
Richardson challenged his conviction for
distribution of child pornography, arguing that he did not “distribute” child
porn by storing images in a shared folder accessible on a peer-to-peer computer
network. Richardson also opposed the district court’s decision to apply a
two-level enhancement for use of a computer under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(6). The
panel affirmed.
Richardson’s first claim was that his actions did
not amount to “distribution” under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(B). Richardson
compared his conduct to leaving magazines containing child porn at a public
location, and that the possibility of someone taking one could not truly be
called “distribution” because a transfer did not officially take place. The
panel noted however that the Fifth Circuit repeatedly affirmed the distribution
enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(3)(B) for the use of a peer-to-peer program.
Other circuits have held that “distribution” may occur when an individual
consciously makes files available for others to take and those files are in
fact taken. See, e.g., United States v. Chiaradio 684 F.3d 265
(1st Cir. 2012); United States v. Shaffer,
472 F.3d 1219 (10th Cir. 2007). The panel concluded, as a matter of first impression,
that Richardson was in fact responsible for distribution due to his use of a
peer-to-peer network.
Richardson also argued that he was a victim of
unwarranted double-counting by the court’s application of a two-level
enhancement under § 2G2.2(b)(6) for use of a computer to commit a crime when
use of a computer was already included as an element of the offense. The panel
held that double-counting is only prohibited if the relevant Guideline
expressly forbids it. Since §
2G2.2(b)(6) does not expressly forbid it, the district court did not err in its
ruling. Furthermore, the statute could be violated in ways other than by using
a computer.
Thanks to FPD Intern Matthew Gonzalez for this post.
Labels: 2G2.2, Child Pornography
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home