Voluntary Departure Constitutes Prior Deportation for § 2L2.2(b)(1) Enhancement
Prior to his criminal case, Murillo-Acosta received
a voluntary departure from an immigration judge in 2013. A voluntary departure provides a deadline by
which the immigrant must leave the United States. If the person does not depart by that time,
the voluntary departure, a warrant of removal issues. Murillo-Acosta complied with the voluntary
departure deadline. Later in 2013,
Murillo-Acosta pled guilty to using a fraudulent visa as proof of permission to
enter the United States. At sentencing,
the court applied—over Murillo-Acosta’s objection—a 2-level enhancement
pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L2.2(b)(1) for being an “unlawful alien who has been
deported (voluntarily or involuntarily) on one or more occasions prior to the
instant offense[.]”
Murillo-Acosta argues that the voluntary departure issued
against him does not make him an “alien who has been deported” since he did not receive a final deportation order. The panel rejects this argument in light of §
2L2.2(b)(1)’s specification that the deportation could be voluntary or involuntary.
Keep in mind that this decision is limited to §
2L2.2(b)(1) which mentions both
voluntarily and involuntary deportations.
This does not apply to, for example, the § 1326 element of a prior deportation
or removal. Voluntary departures are a
form of immigration relief that an immigration judge can grant in lieu of deportation
or removal. 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(a)(1). A person who complies with the voluntary
departure has not received a final order of deportation. The panel’s brief decision—which mentions the
district court’s reliance on decisions from other circuits addressing persons
subject to deportation orders not those
granted voluntary departures—can mistakenly give the impression that a
voluntary departure is a deportation order, but the panel’s holding is solely
based on the language of § 2L2.2(b)(1).
Labels: 2L2.2
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home